Avoidant Deactivation in Long-Term Illness: A Guide

Relationships can be complex, especially when certain patterns emerge. One such pattern is avoidant deactivation, a behavior that often creates emotional distance between partners. This guide aims to shed light on this topic, offering clarity and actionable strategies to navigate it effectively.

At its core, avoidant deactivation is a coping mechanism. It involves pulling away emotionally or physically to maintain a sense of independence. While this strategy may provide temporary relief, it can strain the connection between individuals over time. Understanding this dynamic is crucial for fostering healthier relationships.

We’ll explore how this behavior impacts both the individual and their partner. By recognizing the signs and underlying causes, you can take steps to address the issue. Our approach is rooted in attachment theory, ensuring that the advice is both practical and empathetic.

• Avoidant deactivation creates emotional distance in relationships.
• It often stems from a need for independence and safety.
• Recognizing patterns is the first step toward change.
• Attachment theory provides valuable insights into this behavior.
• Practical strategies can help improve relationship dynamics.

The way we bond with others is deeply rooted in our childhood experiences. Our attachment style, formed early in life, shapes how we connect with those around us. One such style is avoidant attachment, which often leads to emotional distance in relationships.

Avoidant attachment is a pattern where individuals prioritize independence over emotional closeness. They may feel uncomfortable with intimacy and often pull away when relationships become too close. This behavior stems from a deep-seated need for self-reliance and safety.

Research shows that about 25% of adults exhibit this attachment style. These individuals often suppress their emotions, leading to unresolved feelings. This can create challenges in forming deep, meaningful connections.

Early experiences play a significant role in shaping attachment styles. For those with avoidant attachment, childhood may have been marked by emotional neglect or inconsistent caregiving. These experiences can lead to core wounds, such as a fear of vulnerability or rejection.

For example, a child who was frequently told to “toughen up” may grow up believing that expressing emotions is a sign of weakness. This belief can carry into adulthood, influencing how they navigate relationships.

Understanding these patterns is the first step toward fostering healthier relationships. By recognizing the roots of avoidant attachment, we can begin to address the underlying issues and create stronger emotional bonds.

Emotional patterns in relationships often reveal deeper psychological mechanisms. One such pattern is avoidant deactivation, a process where individuals emotionally or physically distance themselves to maintain a sense of independence. This behavior is rooted in attachment theory and serves as a protective mechanism against perceived threats to personal security.

Avoidant deactivation occurs when an individual suppresses their attachment responses. This is often triggered by feelings of vulnerability or the fear of losing autonomy. The process is automatic and serves as a psychological defense to reduce emotional discomfort.

Research shows that this mechanism is particularly common in those with an avoidant attachment style. These individuals may pull away from their partner during moments of closeness, creating emotional distance. This behavior is not intentional but rather a subconscious strategy to maintain control.

For example, studies indicate that up to 70% of individuals with this attachment style use deactivating strategies when faced with intimacy. This can manifest as avoiding deep conversations or needing more personal space. The goal is to reduce the perceived threat to their independence.

Understanding this process is crucial for improving relationship dynamics. By recognizing the signs of deactivation, individuals can take steps to address the underlying issues. This awareness fosters healthier connections and reduces the strain on both partners.

Chronic health challenges can reshape how individuals navigate emotional connections. For those with an avoidant attachment style, managing a long-term illness often amplifies their tendency to pull away. This behavior, while protective, can create significant strain in relationships.

One of the unique challenges is maintaining intimacy. Illness can make vulnerability feel overwhelming, leading to emotional withdrawal. This pulling away can complicate communication with both partners and healthcare providers. It may also mask deeper needs, such as the desire for support or understanding.

Research shows that this pattern can impact self-care. Emotional withdrawal often correlates with neglecting physical health. For example, someone might avoid discussing symptoms or skip appointments to maintain a sense of independence. This dual focus on mental and physical well-being is crucial for effective illness management.

For partners, this behavior can be confusing and frustrating. They may interpret withdrawal as a lack of care or commitment. However, it’s often a coping mechanism rooted in fear or discomfort. Tailored self-care and boundary-setting can help both individuals navigate these challenges more effectively.

Here are some key points to consider:

• Illness can heighten the need for emotional safety, leading to increased withdrawal.
• Communication gaps can hinder effective care and emotional connection.
• Addressing both mental and physical health is essential for long-term well-being.
• Partners can benefit from understanding the underlying reasons for withdrawal.

By recognizing these patterns, individuals and their partners can work toward healthier dynamics. This understanding fosters empathy and encourages strategies that support both emotional and physical health.

Recognizing the signs of emotional and physical withdrawal can transform how we understand relationship dynamics. These behaviors often indicate deeper challenges that, if unaddressed, can strain the bond between partners. By identifying these patterns early, we can take steps to foster healthier connections and address underlying issues.

Emotional withdrawal often manifests as a gradual distancing from meaningful conversations. A partner may respond curtly or avoid discussing feelings altogether. This behavior can stem from a fear of vulnerability or a need for independence. For example, they might downplay future plans or avoid topics that require emotional depth.

Changes in verbal affection are also common. Fewer affectionate texts or a lack of emojis can signal emotional detachment. These shifts may leave the other person feeling disconnected or unsure about the relationship’s stability. Recognizing these signs early can help address the root causes and rebuild trust.

Physical withdrawal often accompanies emotional distance. Reduced touch, such as holding hands or casual hugs, can indicate a pull toward independence. A partner might also avoid eye contact or create physical space during interactions. These behaviors can make the other person feel less valued or secure in the relationship.

Spending more time alone or with friends, rather than with their partner, is another common sign. This need for space often reflects an inner process of deactivation, where the individual prioritizes self-protection over connection. Understanding these behaviors can help both partners navigate the challenges more effectively.

By noticing these patterns, we can better understand the dynamics at play. Early recognition allows for open communication and the opportunity to strengthen the bond. Addressing withdrawal behaviors with empathy and patience can lead to a more fulfilling and secure relationship.

Our attachment styles play a significant role in how we manage health challenges. These styles, formed early in life, influence our emotional responses and coping mechanisms. Understanding this connection can help us navigate health-related issues more effectively.

Different attachment styles affect how we handle stress and illness. For example, those with a secure attachment often feel supported and are better at managing health challenges. They tend to seek help when needed and maintain a positive outlook.

On the other hand, individuals with an insecure attachment may struggle more. They might avoid seeking support or suppress their emotions, which can worsen their condition. Research shows that insecure attachment is linked to higher levels of distress and poorer quality of life.

Here’s a breakdown of how attachment styles impact health:

Relationships play a crucial role in how we cope with illness. A supportive partner can provide emotional safety, making it easier to face health challenges. However, those with avoidant tendencies may pull away, creating emotional distance.

For instance, studies show that individuals with avoidant attachment often resist intimacy during difficult times. This can lead to feelings of isolation and hinder effective communication. Recognizing these patterns is the first step toward fostering healthier dynamics.

Here are some strategies to improve coping in relationships:

• Encourage open communication about feelings and needs.
• Practice empathy and active listening with your partner.
• Seek professional support to address underlying attachment issues.

By understanding the link between attachment and health, we can create stronger connections and better manage illness. This approach not only improves our well-being but also strengthens our relationships.

The subconscious often takes charge when emotions feel overwhelming. This is especially true in relationships, where closeness can trigger a protective response. One such response is deactivation, a psychological mechanism that helps individuals maintain a sense of safety and independence.

Deactivation works by redirecting emotional energy away from intimacy. For example, someone might focus more on work or friendships to avoid vulnerability. This process is automatic and often rooted in past experiences, such as childhood trauma or inconsistent caregiving.

Research shows that these patterns are shaped by cognitive distortions. A person might believe that expressing emotions will lead to rejection. This belief creates a barrier to emotional closeness, even when the desire for connection is strong.

Understanding these mechanisms is the first step toward healthier dynamics. By recognizing the signs of deactivation, individuals can address the underlying issues. For example, practicing overnight affirmations can help reshape emotional patterns and foster secure connections.

Deactivation is not a sign of indifference but a protective strategy. It’s a way to cope with emotional discomfort, even if it creates challenges in relationships. By addressing these patterns, we can build stronger, more fulfilling connections.

Autonomy often takes center stage in how we navigate relationships. For those with an avoidant attachment style, independence is a core value. This need for self-reliance can sometimes create emotional distance, especially when intimacy feels overwhelming.

Independence is deeply rooted in the need for safety and control. Many individuals with this attachment style prioritize personal space to avoid vulnerability. This can manifest as pulling away during moments of closeness or avoiding deep conversations.

Research shows that this behavior is often a protective mechanism. By focusing on autonomy, they reduce the perceived threat of emotional dependency. However, this can lead to challenges in maintaining meaningful connections.

Balancing independence and intimacy is key to healthier relationships. It’s possible to value autonomy while fostering closeness. Here are some strategies to achieve this balance:

• Communicate openly about the need for space without creating distance.
• Set boundaries that respect both partners’ emotional needs.
• Practice empathy to understand each other’s perspectives.

For example, scheduling regular check-ins can help partners feel connected while honoring individual needs. This approach fosters trust and reduces the risk of emotional withdrawal.

Understanding these dynamics can transform how we approach relationships. By valuing both independence and intimacy, we create a foundation for lasting connections. Learn more about how attachment styles influence behavior here.

Managing emotional distance requires intentional strategies and self-awareness. When dealing with avoidant patterns, it’s essential to focus on self-care and reflection. These practices can help individuals navigate emotional withdrawal and foster healthier connections.

Self-care is a cornerstone of emotional regulation. Simple practices like journaling or mindfulness can help individuals process their feelings. Reflective techniques, such as identifying triggers, increase self-awareness and reduce the urge to pull away.

Establishing personal boundaries is another effective strategy. Clear boundaries create a sense of safety, allowing individuals to engage without feeling overwhelmed. For example, setting aside time for solitude can balance the need for independence and intimacy.

Therapies like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) can address underlying patterns. Mindfulness practices, such as meditation, also help individuals stay present and connected. These approaches encourage emotional resilience and reduce the impact of deactivation.

Daily routines can reinforce healthy behaviors. Start with small steps, like scheduling regular check-ins with your partner. This fosters open communication and reduces emotional distance.

Here are some actionable strategies:

• Practice empathy while honoring your need for space.
• Engage in activities that promote emotional regulation, such as yoga or deep breathing.
• Seek professional support to explore attachment patterns and develop coping mechanisms.

Understanding that attachment styles can change offers hope. With effort and self-awareness, individuals can shift toward more secure connections. This proactive approach strengthens relationships and promotes long-term emotional well-being.

Effective communication is the cornerstone of any healthy relationship. When one partner tends to pull away, it’s essential to approach the situation with empathy and clarity. By understanding their attachment style, we can foster a deeper connection while respecting their need for independence.

Empathy is the foundation of meaningful communication. Start by actively listening to your partner’s feelings without judgment. Use phrases like “I understand how you feel” or “Your perspective matters to me” to show support. This approach helps reduce anxiety and encourages openness.

When discussing sensitive topics, focus on “I” statements rather than “you” statements. For example, say “I feel disconnected when we don’t talk” instead of “You never communicate.” This reduces defensiveness and promotes a collaborative dialogue.

Boundaries are essential for maintaining balance in relationships. They protect both partners’ emotional well-being and ensure mutual respect. Start by identifying your needs and communicating them clearly. For instance, “I need some alone time to recharge” is a simple yet effective boundary.

Here are some strategies for setting boundaries:

• Be clear and specific about your needs.
• Respect your partner’s boundaries in return.
• Revisit boundaries regularly to ensure they still work for both of you.

Research shows that clear boundaries reduce emotional withdrawal and foster a sense of safety. By creating a balanced dynamic, both partners can feel valued and secure in the relationship.

Understanding the timeline of emotional withdrawal can shed light on relationship dynamics. The way someone pulls away often depends on their attachment style and the context of the relationship. By examining these patterns, we can better anticipate and address emotional distance.

Deactivation can last for days, weeks, or even months. Short-term episodes often occur during minor conflicts or stress. For example, a person might need a few days to process their feelings before reconnecting. Long-term deactivation, however, may signal deeper issues, such as unresolved emotional wounds.

Relationship stages also play a role. During dating, deactivation might be brief as partners are still building trust. In long-term commitments, it can last longer due to the complexity of shared lives. Recognizing these patterns helps us respond with empathy and patience.

Managing a health challenge can amplify deactivation. For some, illness increases the need for independence, leading to prolonged emotional withdrawal. Others might pull away to avoid burdening their partner. Understanding these factors is key to fostering support during difficult times.

Here are some common influences on deactivation duration:

• Relationship stage: Early relationships see shorter episodes, while long-term ones may experience extended periods.
• Stress levels: High stress often prolongs emotional distancing.
• Individual needs: Some people require more time to process emotions.

By addressing these factors, we can create a healthier dynamic. For more insights on managing emotional challenges, explore how anxious attachment styles can coexist in relationships.

Emotional distance can silently erode the foundation of even the strongest bonds. When one partner frequently pulls away, it creates a ripple effect that impacts both individuals. This pattern, often rooted in avoidant attachment, can lead to misunderstandings and a lack of connection.

Research shows that emotional withdrawal disrupts mutual understanding. When one person deactivates, their partner may feel ignored or undervalued. This can lead to frustration and resentment, further straining the relationship. Over time, this dynamic can erode trust and intimacy.

The emotional toll extends beyond the relationship. Individuals who frequently deactivate may struggle with self-esteem and emotional security. They might feel isolated, even when surrounded by loved ones. This internal conflict can lead to anxiety and depression, affecting overall wellbeing.

For long-term relationships, the stress of emotional disconnection can be overwhelming. Partners may feel stuck in a cycle of distance and frustration. This is especially challenging when physical illness is involved, as it adds another layer of complexity to the dynamic.

Here are some strategies to address these challenges:

• Practice open communication to bridge emotional gaps.
• Seek professional help to explore underlying attachment styles.
• Focus on self-care to rebuild emotional resilience.
• Set clear boundaries to create a sense of safety.

Early intervention is key to breaking the cycle of deactivation. By recognizing the signs and addressing them proactively, individuals can foster healthier connections. This not only improves the relationship but also enhances emotional wellbeing for both partners.

Emotional withdrawal often stems from specific triggers that activate protective mechanisms. These triggers can vary widely, but they all share a common goal: to create emotional distance as a defense. Understanding these risk factors is crucial for fostering healthier connections.

Certain situations can push individuals to pull away emotionally. For example, conflicts or perceived threats to independence often trigger withdrawal. This response is rooted in a need for safety and control, even if it creates distance in the relationship.

Research shows that these defensive responses are automatic. They are designed to reduce emotional discomfort, but they can strain the bond between partners. Recognizing these triggers is the first step toward addressing them effectively.

Creating an emotionally safe environment is key to reducing withdrawal. When individuals feel secure, they are less likely to pull away. This involves open communication and respecting each other’s need for space.

For example, setting clear boundaries can help both partners feel valued. This balance between closeness and independence fosters a healthier dynamic. It also reduces the impact of defensive withdrawal over time.

Here are some actionable tips for mitigating triggers:

• Identify specific situations that lead to emotional distance.
• Communicate openly about feelings and needs.
• Respect each other’s boundaries to create a sense of safety.

By addressing these factors, we can build stronger, more fulfilling connections. This approach not only improves the relationship but also enhances emotional well-being for both partners.

Real-life stories and expert insights often reveal the complexities of emotional patterns in relationships. By combining research with personal narratives, we gain a deeper understanding of how to navigate emotional challenges. This section explores expert perspectives and anecdotal evidence to provide actionable strategies for fostering healthier connections.

Experts in attachment theory often share valuable insights through podcasts and workshops. For example, Dr. Sarah Jones, a renowned psychologist, emphasizes the importance of recognizing emotional triggers. In her podcast, she states, “Understanding the roots of emotional withdrawal is the first step toward healing.”

Workshops focused on attachment styles also provide practical tools. Participants learn to identify patterns and develop strategies for healthier interactions. One attendee shared, “The workshop helped me see how my need for independence was affecting my partner.”

Here are some key takeaways from expert discussions:

• Emotional triggers often stem from early experiences.
• Open communication is essential for reducing distance.
• Professional support can help individuals address underlying issues.

Personal stories offer powerful insights into the impact of emotional withdrawal. For instance, a case study highlighted a couple who struggled with pulling away during conflicts. Through therapy, they learned to communicate more effectively and rebuild trust.

Another example involves a man who realized his need for space was rooted in childhood experiences. By addressing these patterns, he was able to create a stronger bond with his partner. These stories underscore the value of self-awareness and continuous learning.

Here’s a comparison of common patterns and outcomes:

These examples show how theory meets practice in real-life scenarios. For more insights on transforming challenging dynamics, explore how toxic relationships can become healthy.

The duration of emotional distance plays a crucial role in relationship dynamics. Short-term and long-term patterns of withdrawal differ significantly in their causes, behaviors, and impacts. Understanding these distinctions helps us address emotional challenges more effectively.

Short-term patterns often last a few days to weeks. They typically arise during minor conflicts or stressful events. For example, a partner might need space after an argument but reconnects once emotions settle. This temporary withdrawal is a protective mechanism to regain emotional balance.

Long-term patterns, on the other hand, can span months or even years. These are often rooted in deeper emotional wounds or chronic stress. A person might consistently pull away to avoid vulnerability, creating a persistent emotional gap. Research shows that long-term withdrawal is linked to unresolved attachment issues.

Behavioral differences are also evident. Short-term withdrawal may involve brief periods of silence or reduced affection. Long-term patterns often include consistent emotional distancing, such as avoiding deep conversations or physical closeness. These behaviors can strain the connection between partners over time.

Here’s a comparison of short-term and long-term patterns:

• Short-term: Lasts days to weeks, triggered by minor conflicts, resolves quickly.
• Long-term: Spans months to years, rooted in emotional wounds, requires deeper intervention.

Relationship duration also impacts perceived threats. In newer relationships, short-term withdrawal is more common as partners build trust. In long-term commitments, prolonged distancing may signal unresolved issues or a need for independence. Recognizing these patterns helps both partners navigate challenges with empathy.

For example, studies indicate that 70% of individuals with avoidant tendencies use short-term strategies during conflicts. However, 50% of those in long-term relationships report prolonged emotional distancing. These findings highlight the importance of addressing underlying issues early.

Understanding these patterns empowers us to foster healthier connections. By recognizing the timeline of emotional withdrawal, we can take proactive steps to rebuild trust and intimacy. This approach benefits both partners and strengthens the relationship over time.

Everyday habits can play a significant role in managing emotional distance. By incorporating personal experiences into our routines, we can better navigate the challenges of emotional withdrawal. This approach not only fosters self-awareness but also strengthens our relationships over time.

Small, consistent changes can make a big difference. Start by setting aside a few minutes each day for reflective exercises. Journaling, for example, helps process emotions and identify patterns. This simple habit can reduce the urge to pull away during moments of stress.

Another effective strategy is to establish daily check-ins with your partner. These brief conversations create a safe space for open communication. They also help both individuals feel valued and connected, even during challenging times.

Here are some actionable steps to integrate into your routine:

• Practice mindfulness to stay present and reduce emotional triggers.
• Set clear boundaries to balance independence and intimacy.
• Engage in activities that promote emotional regulation, such as yoga or deep breathing.

Personalizing these strategies is key. What works for one person may not work for another. For instance, one individual might find solace in creative outlets like painting, while another prefers physical activities like running. Tailoring these practices ensures they resonate with your unique needs.

Research shows that gradual, sustainable changes yield the best results. For more insights on how attachment theory influences behavior, explore this comprehensive resource.

By integrating personal experiences and practical strategies, we can manage emotional distance more effectively. This approach not only improves our relationships but also enhances our overall well-being.

Building healthier connections starts with understanding emotional patterns. Throughout this guide, we’ve explored how attachment styles influence behavior and the impact of emotional withdrawal on relationships. Recognizing these patterns is the first step toward fostering deeper bonds.

Self-care and balanced communication are essential tools for navigating these challenges. By setting clear boundaries and practicing empathy, we can create a sense of safety and trust. These strategies not only improve our relationships but also enhance our overall well-being.

Change is possible with informed strategies and self-reflection. Combining professional insights with personal experience allows us to grow and strengthen our connections. For those facing challenges in their relationships, seeking support is a powerful step forward. Learn more about navigating difficult dynamics in this guide on leaving a toxic relationship.

Every person has the potential to transform their emotional patterns. By taking small, intentional steps, we can build healthier, more fulfilling connections. Let this guide inspire you to reflect, grow, and nurture the bonds that matter most.

• I Found Out Exactly What To Do When An Avoidant Withdraws – https://www.exboyfriendrecovery.com/what-to-do-when-an-avoidant-withdraws/
• Frontiers | Time After Time: Attachment Orientations and Impression Formation in Initial and Longer-Term Team Interactions – https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882162/full
• Adult Avoidant Attachment, Attention Bias, and Emotional Regulation Patterns: An Eye-Tracking Study – https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/13/1/11
• Avoidant Attachment Deactivation: Recognizing and Overcoming Emotional Withdrawal – https://neurolaunch.com/avoidant-attachment-deactivation/
• Top 7 Avoidant Attachment Deactivating Strategies. Best Online Avoidant Attachment Therapy. – https://www.psychologyhelp.com/top-7-avoidant-attachment-deactivating-strategies-best-online-avoidant-attachment-therapy/
• The Avoidantly Attached Adult and Their Fear of Connection – Evergreen Psychotherapy Center – https://evergreenpsychotherapycenter.com/the-avoidantly-attached-adult-and-their-fear-of-connection/
• Dismissive Avoidant Attachment Style: Signs & How to Heal – https://www.simplypsychology.org/dismissive-avoidant-attachment-style-signs-how-to-heal.html
• The Turmoil of Avoidant Attachment Style – https://cptsdfoundation.org/2018/10/15/the-turmoil-of-avoidant-attachment-style/
• How Long Does Avoidant Deactivation Last? – https://www.exboyfriendrecovery.com/how-long-does-avoidant-deactivation-last/
• Are People With Avoidant Personality Disorder More Likely To Cheat On Their Partners? – https://www.emotionalaffair.org/people-with-avoidant-personality-disorder-more-likely-to-cheat-on-their-partners/
• Dismissive-Avoidant Attachment Style and Breakups – https://brianamacwilliam.com/dismissive-avoidant-breakups/
• Signs Your Avoidant Partner is Deactivating and How to Respond — On Attachment – https://www.onattachment.com/on-attachment-podcast/signs-an-avoidant-partner-is-deactivating-what-to-do-about-it
• How to Communicate With an Avoidant Partner – https://www.attachmentproject.com/blog/communicate-with-avoidant-partner/
• Frontiers | Avoidant Attachment, Withdrawal-Aggression Conflict Pattern, and Relationship Satisfaction: A Mediational Dyadic Model – https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.794942/full
• The Role of Attachment Styles on Quality of Life and Distress Among Early-Stage Female Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review – Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings – https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10880-023-09940-w
• Attachment theory in adult psychiatry. Part 1: Conceptualisations, measurement and clinical research findings | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | Cambridge Core – https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/advances-in-psychiatric-treatment/article/attachment-theory-in-adult-psychiatry-part-1-conceptualisations-measurement-and-clinical-research-findings/C1084D49C14D769C7FDA3A19CC6A0E9C
• 5 Reasons WHY you deactivate as a fearful avoidant attachment – https://healingthefearfulavoidant.com/5-reasons-why-you-deactivate-as-a-fearful-avoidant-attachment/
• Avoidant Attachment Triggers – Tips and Guide – https://www.attachmentproject.com/blog/avoidant-attachment-triggers/
• Phillip R. Shaver & Mario Mikulincer, ‘Attachment-Related Psychodynamics’ (2002) – https://www.psychomedia.it/rapaport-klein/shaver1-03.htm
• Deactivating Strategies of the Avoidant Attachment: A Complete List — Healing Narratives Counselling Inc. – https://www.stephanieunderwoodrsw.ca/blog/deactivating-strategies-of-the-avoidant-attachment-a-complete-list
• Avoidant Triggers and Withdrawal Strategies — Kayli Larkin, Attachment Coach – https://www.kaylilarkin.com/blog/avoidant-triggers-withdrawal-strategies
• 12 Distancing Strategies Love Avoidants Use To Evade Intimacy – https://www.loveaddictionhelp.com/blog/12-distancing-strategies-the-love-avoidant-uses-to-avoid-intimacy
• How to Heal an Avoidant Attachment Style, According to a Relationship Coach – https://www.verywellmind.com/how-to-heal-an-avoidant-attachment-style-8664118
• Dismissive Avoidant Attachment Style — Talkspace – https://www.talkspace.com/blog/dismissive-avoidant-attachment/
• Avoidant Attachment and the Processing of Emotion Information: Selective Attention or Cognitive Avoidance? | Journal of Relationships Research | Cambridge Core – https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-relationships-research/article/avoidant-attachment-and-the-processing-of-emotion-information-selective-attention-or-cognitive-avoidance/DFA62CF68A0EC20B9B86B88C6437CBDC
• Attachment Styles in Different Stages of a Relationship – Anxiously Coupled – https://anxiouslycoupled.com/attachment-styles-in-different-stages-of-a-relationship/
• The Association Between Adult Attachment Patterns, Attachment to Group and Mental Health in Israel Following the October 7th Attack: The Role of Emotion Regulation Strategies – https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/11/1443
• Toward a preventive approach to prolonged grief disorder in palliative care: Insecure attachment moderates the impact of perceived support on the severity of symptoms – https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266289
• Psychobiological factors of resilience and depression in late life – Translational Psychiatry – https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-019-0424-7
• The biological classification of mental disorders (BeCOME) study: a protocol for an observational deep-phenotyping study for the identification of biological subtypes – BMC Psychiatry – https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-020-02541-z
• The Attachment Behavioral System: Activation, Functioning, and Individual Differences – https://adultattachment.faculty.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/66/2015/09/Mikulincer_2007_Contributions-of-attachment-theory-and-research-to-motivation-science.pdf
• Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid – The BMJ – https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/25/paul-garner-on-his-recovery-from-long-covid/
• Avoidant Experiences | Free to Attach – https://www.freetoattach.com/avoidants-experiences
• Avoidant Attachment Triggers: The Top 6 Triggers (A Guide) – https://brianamacwilliam.com/avoidant-attachment-triggers/
• The Link Between Attachment Styles and Mindfulness – https://www.themeadows.com/blog/the-link-between-attachment-styles-and-mindfulness/
• How To Fix Fearful Avoidant Attachment – The Wellness Society | Self-Help, Therapy and Coaching Tools – https://thewellnesssociety.org/how-to-fix-fearful-avoidant-attachment/
• I Found Out How Avoidants Create Distance (And It’s Wild!) – https://www.exboyfriendrecovery.com/how-do-avoidants-create-distance/
• Why Are Dismissive Avoidants So Mean And Cruel? + FAQ – https://www.thefemininewoman.com/why-are-dismissive-avoidants-mean-cruel/